Talk:Hellcats/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 13:53, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 13:54, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

Linkrot: one found and tagged. Jezhotwells (talk) 14:00, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria

 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * Reasonably well written apart from: The CW has announced that Hellcats is moving to Tuesday nights, at 9/8c, "9/8c" needs clarification, we don't use abbreviations. There are other instances of this.
 * Switched 9/8c for 9-10pm. Is it better? Decodet (talk) 21:45, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Recption and accoldes sections: Stray sentences, Accolades is only one sentence, please consolidate into previous section
 * Done! Is it better now? Decodet (talk) 21:45, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * Ref #59 is a dead link. The newspaper only keeeps stories for 30 days, nothing in the Internet Archive. Jezhotwells (talk) 14:00, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Otherwise references check out, RS, no OR
 * Couldn't find an alternative link, so I removed the line from the article. Decodet (talk) 21:45, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * Sufficient detail, no trivia
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * OK, on hold for seven days for above issues to be addressed. Jezhotwells (talk) 14:18, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for reviewing the article! Decodet (talk) 21:45, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Ok, I think that ticks the boxes. I am happy to list this. Congratulations! Jezhotwells (talk) 19:15, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
 * OK, on hold for seven days for above issues to be addressed. Jezhotwells (talk) 14:18, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for reviewing the article! Decodet (talk) 21:45, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Ok, I think that ticks the boxes. I am happy to list this. Congratulations! Jezhotwells (talk) 19:15, 14 March 2011 (UTC)