Talk:Henry B. Plant

Biography assessment rating comment
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- KenWalker | Talk 04:09, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

Wikification wikiproject comment
I have done a bunch of formatting, added metadata and an infobox as per the biography group's project page, and added a bunch of internal links. DLPanther 18:49, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject class rating
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 16:47, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

itchy trigger finger?
I don't know what "claims" you're referring to in your edit summary. There's nothing controversial here. The IP editor seems to be pretty knowledgeable about Plant, and s/he mostly just expanded names, added wikilinks, and put in a few basic factiods that are likely already mentioned in existing citations. This article was pretty bad and hadn't been seriously edited in a looong time, so any decent additions by a new user should be welcomed, not reverted. And then we wonder why Wikipedia doesn't keep old editors or draw new ones like it used to...

Anyway, ol' Henry has been on my re-write list for years, and while I don't have time to overhaul the whole thing right now, I'll at least smooth out a few rough edges while I'm here. Zeng8r (talk) 17:50, 4 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Then I'd except an edit summary something like, "New factoids added, which are still supported by existing references."   -  FlightTime  ( open channel ) 18:57, 4 September 2017 (UTC)