Talk:Herbert Baxter Adams Prize

Regarding "Notability"
Title supllied above by: Ludvikus (talk) 00:32, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

I note that almost by definition a prize for a "first book" will not be useful to establish notability, unless other works follow., DGG (talk) 00:11, 29 April 2008 (UTC)


 * What's the point, or relevance of your "note" here? Ludvikus (talk) 00:34, 29 April 2008 (UTC)


 * I think this is in regards to the number of red links in the list of recipients. It is a fair point and it is one I had considered while reformatting the list. My thought was that the winning of an international level award would go a lot towards a person's notability, but I could be wrong of course! Ashanda (talk)

Requested move
Herbert Baxter Adams prize → Herbert Baxter Adams Prize — The official name of the prize has the word "Prize" (with "P/p" capitalized) —Ludvikus (talk) 01:32, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

Survey

 * Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with  or  , then sign your comment with  . Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.


 * Support.
 * This is clearly an uncontroversial move: there is no such thing as the "Herbert Baxter Adams" prize.
 * The full name of the prize is: "Herbert Baxter Adams Prize."
 * --Ludvikus (talk) 02:02, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

Discussion

 * Any additional comments:

-
 * You didn't have to do this. If you hadn't commented out the speedy deletion template that I set up on the redirect, it would have been done. Ashanda (talk) 03:04, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
 * By "you" you must mean me. I did not notice any Speedy Deletion! --Ludvikus (talk) 03:15, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Anyway, what you're saying implies there's no controversy, right? --Ludvikus (talk) 03:18, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Move completed. This is noncontroversial. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not love) 05:20, 29 April 2008 (UTC)