Talk:Hibla Gerzmava

The letter
@Lute88. Why do you think this should be included? There where 500 people who signed the letter, and this is one of them. Are you going to include this to 500 BLPs? Why this is so important? She is not a politician and, unlike Geriev, is not an outspoken supporter of Putin's administration. I believe this is simply undue. This looks to me as cherry picking of negative information about living person. My very best wishes (talk) 01:43, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
 * In addition, sources you provided do not support the statement "Ukrainian Ministry of Culture blacklisted signatories of this letter, from performing in Ukraine". I do not see any of these sources telling that she was actually blacklisted. And would not you agree that this source is not reliable? My very best wishes (talk) 02:03, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Lifenews is not unreliable per se, as it deals in halftruths. So the factoid question is reliable. Gerzmava was recently a subject of several picketings in New York, so IMO her podpisantstvo is sufficiently non undue to be included. IMO an individual like Butman doesn't have to have this, but Gerzmava is a lot more visible, and exluding her hrom the podpisant list smacks of WP:CENSORSHIP.Lute88 (talk) 16:37, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
 * IMO the podpisant list merits its own wiki category.Lute88 (talk) 16:40, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
 * So, which exactly sources tell that (a) she was actually forbidden to travel to Ukraine, and (b) that her signature was a subject of significant controversy (demonstrations in New York, etc.)? My very best wishes (talk) 17:11, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Given no response here, let's assume we agreed not include this material. My very best wishes (talk) 20:53, 15 October 2015 (UTC)