Talk:Hiller OH-23 Raven

the article was not moved. However, the article was moved in accordance with Wikipedia's Naming conventions (aircraft). --Born2flie 02:41, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

Move article
The Hiller model 360 was previously, and is currently produced as the UH-12. It has more of a presence commercially even though it is more popularly known as a military aircraft in aviation circles. I recommend that the article be renamed to one of two options: The former makes the most sense with "Hiller H-23" and "Hiller OH-23", etc. redirecting to the new name. (Born2flie 19:01, 2 October 2006 (UTC))
 * Hiller UH-12
 * Hiller UH-12/OH-23


 * I'd support Hiller UH-12/H-23. As you stated, it is "more popularly known as a military aircraft in aviation circles", so it makes sense to me to include the military name, in addition to the civil name. - BillCJ 02:11, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

Pic position
I had tried that pic below the History header yesterday. However, it left a wide gap between the TOC and the header in my browser (IE7), so I put it above the Intro, and it looked right. - BillCJ 02:11, 16 December 2006 (UTC)


 * I just checked the current configuration of the article in IE7 on mine and it looks the same as in Firefox. Does it still have a gap on yours?
 * --Born2flie 15:02, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

Yup. I view on 800x600, that might make a difference. Does placing the pic above the Intro in the make a difference in your viewing of it? - BillCJ 16:31, 16 December 2006 (UTC)


 * At 1024x768 when you have both the infobox and the pic at the beginning of the page, the links to edit the lower sections get displaced to much lower in the page. I figured the functionality of the edit links was more important than exactly where the pic placement occurs. I'll have to verify that the same thing occurs in IE7 with your pic location.
 * --Born2flie 17:38, 16 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Seems to be a Firefox phenomenon, possibly Mozilla-wide?
 * --Born2flie 17:42, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

I agree the links are more important than the gap, so whatever you need to do to get it to work right for the Firefox/Mozillas is fine with me, assuming eveerything is viewable in IE7 also. - BillCJ 18:04, 16 December 2006 (UTC)


 * I put it back into the history section.
 * --Born2flie 21:13, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

Bell or Hiller
quote: all later models featured the "Goldfish bowl" canopy similar to the Bell 47, and also featured the Bell-designed short weighted gyro-stabilizer bar. :

Not true.

The "bowl" is visually similar, yes. The UH-23 never employed Bell design for it's rotor system. Stanley Hiller invented the Rotormatic system, with paddles. This system is very much alive today, Radio Control helicopters use this system almost exclusively.

Pulse Helicopters and Dynamic Aviation are a couple of web sources for images and/or info.

69.29.248.91 17:24, 1 February 2007 (UTC)


 * I have tagged the offending statement for verification. If I can't find a verified source for it, I will remove it myself.
 * --Born2flie 22:59, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

Variants
An IP editor made this edit (diff) which I reverted because it eliminated some information and chose to group several variants as only "marketing". However, some of the edits to variants were possibly valid, for instance, the editor stated that there was no civilian UH-12D and that UH-12D models are UH-23D aircraft conformed to the type certificate for civilian operation. This seems to be substantiated by the Type certificate (4H10) for the UH-12D. In any event, the edits should be reviewed and incorporated where they are shown to be valid. --Born2flie (talk) 16:58, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

twin or double
''The Raven could be armed with twin M37C .30-caliber on the XM1 armament subsystem or twin M60C 7.62 mm machine guns on the M2 armament subsystem. '' I suggest the Hiller was armed on both sides, so twin machine guns would mean this tiny thing had 4 guns. Is that correct?--WerWil (talk) 12:14, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Assessment comment
Substituted at 17:55, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

What is a "three-place" aircraft...?
The opening sentence states that the Hiller OH-23 is a "three-place" helicopter. What does this mean...? Did someone mean "three-piece" (cockpit, engine, body) perhaps...? Could someone please correct or define what this is supposed to mean...? Thx. Gmeades (talk) 05:22, 24 May 2020 (UTC)


 * It's seating space for 3 people. It may mean 3 individual seats, 3 sets of seat belts on a bench seat, or some combination. In this case, I'm not certain which it means, so I'm hesitant to change it. - BilCat (talk) 05:35, 24 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the explanation, BilCat. A bit curious though, for a couple of reasons. One being, of course, why whoever wrote the line didn't say "3-seat" to make their statement clear. But even more curious being the fact that under the "variants" section of the article, it explains that the seating configuration for this model ranged from 2 to 4 seats, depending on the particular variant that was ordered/produced. This would appear to make the statement, regardless of whether it meant seats or seatbelts, to actually be incorrect, and a description more like it being a "2-4 seat, light-observation helicopter" to be more appropriate, perhaps. Gmeades (talk) 06:10, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

“3 place” is a common aviation term maybe we need to make it easier for non pilots to understand what it means ? RobertGary1 (talk) 01:20, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

Nickname
What is meant by the nickname "Hiller killer?" It should probably be explained in the text.

*Septegram*Talk*Contributions* 14:48, 21 September 2020 (UTC)