Talk:History of rockets

False source sited
"A depiction of the "long serpent" rocket launcher from the 11th century book Wujing Zongyao." This drawing absolutely did not come from the original 11th Century version of the book Wujing Zongyao. No such rockets or rocket launchers existed for a couple hundred years after the 11th Century. Needham's book, Volume 4, p. 496 does not even treat subjects of the 11th Century time period. This drawing and the associated sighting are nonsense. This needs to be deleted until an appropriated siting and explanation of the drawing are given. Otherwise the drawing should be left out.Magneticlifeform (talk) 04:40, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 one external links on History of rockets. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081217125224/http://www.astronautix.com/data/saenger.pdf to http://www.astronautix.com/data/saenger.pdf
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090105094548/http://www.astronautix.com:80/lvs/a9a10.htm to http://www.astronautix.com/lvs/a9a10.htm
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080516041643/http://www.museumofaviation.org/aircraftCollection/missiles_drones/04-air2a.htm to http://www.museumofaviation.org/aircraftCollection/missiles_drones/04-air2a.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 11:22, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

Requested move 10 October 2016

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: No consensus to move &mdash; Amakuru (talk) 13:44, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

History of rockets → history of rocketry – better name 65.94.171.217 (talk) 05:39, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

Survey

 * Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with  or  , then sign your comment with  . Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.


 * Support I am the nominator -- 65.94.171.217 (talk) 02:43, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Oppose – Both names would be fine but I see no harm in the current title. — JFG talk 15:58, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

Discussion

 * Any additional comments:


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on History of rockets. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120303205010/http://www.nal.res.in/pdf/pdfrocket.pdf to http://www.nal.res.in/pdf/pdfrocket.pdf
 * Added tag to http://www.ksopit.pl/sladami_kopyt/legendarne_formacje_kawalerii/rakietnicy

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 12:18, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on History of rockets. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131117002101/http://weaponsandwarfare.com/?p=16618 to http://weaponsandwarfare.com/?p=16618
 * Added tag to http://www.napoleonic-literature.com/Articles/Rockets/History_of_Rockets.htm
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130823210111/http://freespace.virgin.net/iw.history/rockets/dennett.htm to http://freespace.virgin.net/iw.history/rockets/dennett.htm
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081019234511/http://epizodsspace.testpilot.ru/bibl/dorev-knigi/ciolkovskiy/issl-03st.html to http://epizodsspace.testpilot.ru/bibl/dorev-knigi/ciolkovskiy/issl-03st.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150319073055/http://www.faa.gov/other_visit/aviation_industry/designees_delegations/designee_types/ame/media/Section%20III.4.1.7%20Returning%20from%20Space.pdf to https://www.faa.gov/other_visit/aviation_industry/designees_delegations/designee_types/ame/media/Section%20III.4.1.7%20Returning%20from%20Space.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 04:50, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

Kindly ignore, I'm blind :)

Harvard refs not working
Most of the harvnb refs that are used in this article are not working. This includes Zaloga 2003, Goddard 2002, Clary 2003, Esnault-Pelterie 1913, Space History Division 1999, and many others. This means the actual reference details are not provided in the article. I assume that this is just due to some cross-editing but I think we need to decide whether to just cut all these out rather than including a bunch of ghost-refs. The reason I noticed this is that I wanted to check the authenticity of the claim made in this article that, prior to the development of the Laval nozzle, rocket efficiencies were 2%. Ordinary Person (talk) 08:39, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 17:12, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Konstantin Tsiolkovsky 1934.jpg

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 23:13, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Oldest depiction of rocket arrows.jpg

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 07:45, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Konstantin Tsiolkovsky 1934.jpg

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:39, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Oldest depiction of rocket arrows.jpg

Orphaned references in History of rockets
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of History of rockets's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "R&P_Vol1": From Gas Dynamics Laboratory:  From RS-82 (rocket family):  

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:26, 9 July 2022 (UTC)


 * ✅ Ilenart626 (talk) 08:17, 9 July 2022 (UTC)