Talk:Hit and run

This article needs indefinite semi-protection
This article is currently subject to frequent vandalism, with large portions disappearing for months at a time. I request any available administrator to impose semi-protection indefinitely until the issue is brought under control. --Coolcaesar (talk) 07:36, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

The punishment for hit and runs is not "DEATH". This article has been vandalized. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.196.166.93 (talk) 19:31, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

Photoshop
The photo in this article is pretty silly... — RockMFR 00:47, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

Requested move

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: move. --  tariq abjotu  05:34, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

– The "vehicular" usage is clearly the primary meaning and the meaning from which all other topics at the disambiguation page derive their name. It's silly to have to specify "(vehicular)" in the title. Theoldsparkle (talk) 15:04, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Hit and run (vehicular) → Hit and run
 * Hit and run → Hit and run (disambiguation)
 * Support. I don't think any of the other uses of "hit and run" are used anywhere as commonly in reliable sources as is this one.  I'd be happy to change my mind in the face of evidence to the contrary.    --B2C 22:13, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Support, most if not all of the other uses are derived from this meaning, which is clearly the primary topic.--Xiaphias (talk) 04:26, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Oppose – there is nothing silly about disambiguating a title from 30 other meanings. People are never going to type the "(vehicular)"; that's what links and disambig pages are for.  Dicklyon (talk) 05:12, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Support, clear primary topic. Red Slash 07:08, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Support per nom. -- Necrothesp (talk) 16:51, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Hyphens in title?
Should this article be named "Hit and run" (current name) or the hyphenated form "Hit-and-run" (as first used in the article itself, though inconsistently thereafter)?

Normally, we'd follow WP:COMMONNAME for this, but sources do not appear consistent.

I think the hyphenated form is more grammatically correct, especially as commonly used in noun phrases like "a hit-and-run driver", where the term as a whole is used as single adjective for the following noun(s).

Comments? --A&#8239;D&#8239;Monroe&#8239;III(talk) 17:31, 17 December 2019 (UTC)


 * I agree completely that it should be "Hit-and-run." -  Julietdeltalima   (talk)  20:56, 17 December 2019 (UTC)

Requested move 18 December 2019

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 

The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 21:40, 2 January 2020 (UTC)

Hit and run → Hit-and-run – Per above, including hyphens is more grammatically correct, especially as often used as an adjective, and appears more common in use, at least according to this Ngram A&#8239;D&#8239;Monroe&#8239;III(talk) 20:06, 18 December 2019 (UTC) —Relisted. – Ammarpad (talk) 10:41, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Support per nom, also according to Cambridge dictionary --Less Unless (talk) 00:20, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Oppose. Hyphens are grammatically correct when this is used as an adjective, but article titles are nouns under WP:NOUN. The greater frequency of adjectival use isn't pertinent in that case. Dekimasu よ! 07:21, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
 * I don't understand this argument. No one is suggesting using an adjective here.  When hyphenated, it's a noun phrase, which fits NOUN.  --A&#8239;D&#8239;Monroe&#8239;III(talk)  03:35, 2 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Oppose per Dekimasu. When used as an isolated noun, this phrase should not be hyphenated. "He was injured in a hit and run". The hyphens only appear when it becomes an adjective. "He was injured in a hit-and-run incident". &mdash; Amakuru (talk) 16:22, 2 January 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.