Talk:Hoabinhian

Time Chart--Overtaken by Events?
In the time chart at the head of the article, the Hoabinhian in classified as Mesolithic and given a date which differs from the date in the lead paragraph and from that given in the summary of the decisions of the most recent congress, which also ruled that Hoabinhian isn't Mesolithic. Can anyone reconcile these contradictions?

Terry J. Carter (talk) 15:46, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

Unsourced POV
Where does Tagore et al. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8008685/ say Onge are 35% East Asian? Please provide source. Studies that came out this year also do not model Onge as mixed, but separate/very different group from Southeast/East Asians, Onge are also not closely related to Hoabianin. My problem is you claiming them as mixed when they are not, which is not even in source. 117.198.115.23 (talk) 22:37, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Tagore said nothing about 35/32%. The sentence says clearly "previous studies" found this 32/25%.  I have tagged this as citation needed.  Please read the full sentence carefully.  Chaipau (talk) 23:45, 26 September 2021 (UTC)