Talk:Holochroal eye

Redirect
Do we really need this page? Or just re-direct to Trilobite?? Psuedomorph (talk) 11:31, 8 October 2008 (UTC)


 * This page has the scope to be expanded (e.g. the physics etc); it is about a subject in its own right. The eyes section of trilobite is already quite long and messy.  I think we should keep this page; I'll expand it further when I get the opportunity. Martin  (Smith609 – Talk)  14:02, 8 October 2008 (UTC)


 * In that case how about moving some of the material from trilobite over & same with the other sections? I agree with the length of the eye section in trilobite being too long (mostly my fault), and so sort 2+ problems at the same time. Psuedomorph (talk) 10:13, 9 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Sounds good to me! Martin  (Smith609 – Talk)  13:56, 9 October 2008 (UTC)


 * OK, the games a foot... Psuedomorph (talk) 15:38, 9 October 2008 (UTC)


 * On reflection... does Trilobite Eye seem better as a page with the 3 types within it? Would save a lot repetition on different pages... Psuedomorph (talk) 15:48, 21 November 2008 (UTC)