Talk:Horasis

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Horasis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120323003412/http://www.gouvernement.lu/salle_presse/discours/premier_ministre/2010/11-novembre/22-juncker/index.html to http://www.gouvernement.lu/salle_presse/discours/premier_ministre/2010/11-novembre/22-juncker/index.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 00:38, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Meeting Info & Images
Hey! So I completely agree on the first too edits. On the last major one, however, I think most of that information is pretty valid for the article, based off of standards seen in other articles, like World Economic Forum, Mobile World Congress, Group of 7 (et. al). Thoughts? Cristiano Tomás (talk) 11:30, 11 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Thank you for raising the issue here. Please read WP:NOTDIRECTORY, editors have often added such lists in good faith in the past, but most of them don't provide any substantial encyclopedic information about the topic. As mentioned in a previous discussion, of course noteworthy attendances can be mentioned but such details should be covered in prose and must be based on independent reliable sources. Just to give a random purely theoretical example: "Politician X gave a speech about topic Z in YYYY, that has been praised/criticized by media/other experts/public discussion". Such substantial information in context is a hundred times more useful for readers to understand the topic instead of an indiscriminate mass of blue links. If a reader is really interested in a listing of dozens of speakers or a list of old conferences, such information is usually provided on the topic's official website anyway (and also better maintained and more actual). Sourced lists can also be created as stand-alone pages, if the list topic is deemed notable in itself.


 * Regarding images: The World Economic Forum article is also overloaded with decorative images, but that's a separate issue. Images should only be used, when they provide substantial encyclopedic information or help to illustrate/clarify main text content with some visual context. For example: if a notable speaker is mentioned in prose, a speaker image could be added (on a case by case base). GermanJoe (talk) 11:50, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

Advertisement tag
The article has a tag that "This article contains content that is written like an advertisement". I think content like that has already been removed. Is there still any content that requires clean up? Farid (talk) 21:29, 15 April 2019 (UTC)


 * I believe, I found most major issues with non-neutral language and PR speak. A few minor issues may remain here and there, but I'm OK with removing the maintenance tag for serious problems. Further polishing can always be done with regular editing. By the way, I added a new header for this question, just for clarity. GermanJoe (talk) 22:49, 15 April 2019 (UTC)