Talk:Horsforth Hall Park

Article Split Suggestion
There is a large amount of information about the history of a now demolished building, which I don't imagine is what someone is hoping for when they look for an article about the park where it once stood.

A new article about Horsforth Hall would allow for the detailed history to be kept, perhaps with information about the building's architecture and anything else worth noting. (if that information is avaliable anywhere). And it would give space for the current article to be fully focused on the park itself, with just a couple sentences on it's namesake. D'n'B-t -- 18:09, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Would there be sufficient information on the park? Keith D (talk) 19:23, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
 * I should think so the park has enough features and regular events to be worth documenting. I suppose it depends what you'd consider to be a minimum amount of information in an article about a park. Besides, if there weren't sufficient information about the park, there'd still be a case for moving the buildings history from Horsforth Hall Park to Horsforth Hall. D'n'B-t -- 19:55, 23 March 2024 (UTC)