Talk:Hotel Chevalier

Promotion Scheme
This section was interesting to read, and while I agree that it could be possibly true, there seems to be no source for it. Also, it sounds slightly biased. There should be a source added for it, or maybe it should be condensed a bit... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.80.185.220 (talk) 05:22, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

"Responds Coldly" ?
i changed this, as "I promise I will never be your friend, no matter what, ever." is not a cold response, but a passionate one--Mongreilf (talk) 20:13, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

Plot summary
The plot summary in this article is way too long, especially since the film is only 13 minutes. I saw it once and I don't remember it being that complex, so I think a paragraph (or maybe two short ones) should be enough. I don't remember the film well enough to rewrite it, but there are much longer feature films that have shorter plot summaries. – Dream out loud (talk) 18:42, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
 * This is a featured article, judged to be of a professional standard of composition. The synopsis of the film (not "plot summary") is by no means overwhelming of the remainder of the text, and is well within conventions for high quality film articles. I'm sorry but, "I saw it once and I don't remember it being that complex, so" is not an adequate rationale.  Skomorokh   18:58, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
 * I don't see how a "plot summary" is different than a synopsis (unless its a non-fictional film). According to WP:FILMPLOT, "Plot summaries for feature films should be between 400 and 700 words" and the "synopsis" here is 580 words.  That is way too long.  Of course there should be an explanation of the film's plot, but there is just way too much detail here.  This film his almost half the length of a TV episode in a 1/2 time block.  There's no need to explain every single thing that happens in the film.  Just because it is a featured article doesn't mean its perfect and needs no change.  Policies and standards change over time and I have seen plenty of featured articles that aren't "perfect" and some that get delisted.  Of course this is by no means a poorly writte n FA, but its plot summary (aka "synopsis") just needs to be trimmed down. – Dream out loud  (talk) 05:05, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

Super Detailed Plot
Is it necessary to describe every little detail - is this for people who can't be bothered to watch it? Usually a summary is just that, this is practically a transcript - without dialogue. 174.91.4.181 (talk) 14:35, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

Does this really belong in WikiProject Hotels?
I'm looking around at quality of hotel articles, as I plan to write/improve quite a few, and noting that this was shot in the Hôtel Raphaël in Paris, and is not a real hotel, does this article belong in the Hotels Wikiproject??Skookum1 (talk) 05:25, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

This article is a part of WikiProject Hotels because it does not have to be a hotel.Tomandjerry211 (talk) 23:37, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Hotel Chevalier. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20121105142847/http://www.hindu.com/thehindu/holnus/009200710261252.htm to http://www.hindu.com/thehindu/holnus/009200710261252.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 17:49, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hotel Chevalier. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090707040620/http://thephoenix.com/Boston/Movies/48544-Darjeeling-unlimited/ to http://thephoenix.com/boston/movies/48544-darjeeling-unlimited/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 08:48, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Copyedits
I have made a number of copy-edits to the article. I applaud the tremendous work of the main author of this article, and would encourage him/her to review the changes I've made, and, if (s)he finds my edits unhelpful and/or damaging to the article's integrity, to revert them without any hesitation. Greetings, Gertanis (talk) 20:52, 3 June 2017 (UTC)