Talk:Hugh O'Leary

Notability
O'Leary seems to be an unremarkable accountant whose only significance is the identity of his spouse. Is that sufficient notability for a Wikipedia article? 76.65.24.235 (talk) 15:01, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

There have been some discrepancies (lies?) in what Truss has stated regarding O'Leary's role in the List of ministers' interests, which, over the course of time and investigation, may make him more significant. Also, all previous spouses of PMs have their own article - see https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spouse_of_the_prime_minister_of_the_United_Kingdom SuzannaQ (talk) 12:12, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:07, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
 * 180922-Reception for Heads of State-25 (52367200721) (Hugh O'Leary).jpg

Are all accountants to have a Wikipedia page?
Or just the one who is married to the shortest serving UK Prime Minister?

Or is Wikipedia making a subtle point that being married to that person is, of itself, a noteworthy achievement?

if the former, suggest either a special project to rapidly add pages for all accountants to Wikipedia, or else removal of this particular accountant's page.

If the latter, citations should be provided to demonstrate the claimed noteworthiness.