Talk:Hulme Arch Bridge

DYK?
Surely a candidate for DYK? --Jza84 | Talk  11:18, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
 * It's already a candidate; see here. :) Mike Peel (talk) 14:18, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Couple of things
Some of the distances and measurements would benefit from using Template:convert.

Also, would it be possible to find an alternative source for citation 2? www.manchester2002-uk.com was deemed unreliable by WP:GM sometime back. --Jza84 | Talk  11:24, 31 March 2008 (UTC)


 * I've added the convert template to some of the sizes, such that they now give both meters and feet. Please let me know if they need adding anywhere else. I've also removed the manchester2002-uk reference, as well as the sentence that it was referencing. I was a bit doubtful about the bridge being one of the first of modern times anyway, as it depends on your definition of "modern times". I'd count the Mancunion Way as a modern bridge, even though it's ~ 50 years old... Relying on a tertiary source for that probably isn't a good plan. Mike Peel (talk) 18:25, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

GA Review

 * GA review (see here for criteria) (see here for this contributor's history of GA reviews)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written:
 * Not Yet
 * 1) The Lead section should summarize the entire article in a few sentences/paragraphs. General infroation about the entire article should be generally addressed in it.
 * 2) It appears that the article needs a "history" section. The lead should not have references in it, so consider moving some of the more detailed parts of the Bridge's history into the new section; the lead should only contain general ideas, not the more spefic details.
 * 3) It is factually accurate and verifiable:
 * Pass no problems there.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage:
 * Not Yet the Bridge needs a history section to cover major events relating to it.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy:
 * Pass No problems there.
 * 1) It is stable:
 * Not Yet once the above issues are resolved, this should be fine.
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate:
 * Pass
 * 1) Overall:
 * On Hold The article needs a little more work, but it is well on its way to GA. -Ed! (talk) 21:57, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
 * I've given the article another look and it seems to meet the points I addressed well. Good work! - Ed! (talk) (Hall of Fame)  03:51, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks! Mike Peel (talk) 07:23, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 one external links on Hulme Arch Bridge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060323201013/http://www.arup.com/europe/project.cfm?pageid=190 to http://www.arup.com/europe/project.cfm?pageid=190
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071016234216/http://www.arup.com/bridges/project.cfm?pageid=2700 to http://www.arup.com/bridges/project.cfm?pageid=2700

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 20:04, 23 February 2016 (UTC)