Talk:Human Relief Foundation

Could you please explain further...
Could you please explain this deletion?

Cheers! Geo Swan (talk) 13:27, 26 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Exuse me can you tell why you chose this can of article, it seems you trying to downgrade this organization. you could of mention something else especailly it is the first time this name metioned in Wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Closenet82 (talk • contribs) 10:06, 27 April 2009 (UTC)


 * I don't remember how I came across this article. I thought it was a weak article on a topic worth covering.  It had recently been nominated for deletion, as db-spam.  I found it (1) unreferenced; (2) unbalanced.  I owe no one any apology for trying to address these problems.  And I continue to think the three edits that followed my good faith efforts, that restored the article to a biased state, required explanation.  That's moot now.  Geo Swan (talk) 13:24, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

On second thought...
On second thought I reverted the change above. When I took a closer look at it it left two thirds of the body of the article a direct quote from a news article -- and I think this lapses from WP:COPYVIO.

Cheers! Geo Swan (talk) 13:32, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

Playing the Race Card?
As reported in the Mail-Online, 6 October 2015: "UK charity considers cutting off aid for the ‘Jungle’ at Calais after visiting the camp and deciding most migrants had no real reason to leave their home country". By helping to fuel the Migrants Go Home sub-text, this Inhuman Relief Foundation seems to be attacking the very people it claims to help - No Ten, UKIP and the Daily Mail must be very proud of them. So, if the facts and quotes check out, might not this report be mentioned in the article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.13.191.189 (talk) 13:57, 15 November 2015 (UTC)