Talk:Humanitarian corridor

It reminds me of the free speech zone. A place for people who want to act normal for a bit.

What kind of sources do you plan to use?

Stuff like this?

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/world_now/2012/03/turkey-syria-humanitarian-aid.html

84.106.26.81 (talk) 22:17, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

Deprod
The Companion to International Humanitarian Law discusses this subject over at least three pages from pp. 390–. SpinningSpark 13:44, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
 * I'm sure it does. But IHL covers very many topics and I don't think they all warrant an article. Anyway, I don't have strong views on it, I just felt this one (a few sentences, one reference) didn't meet the bar. I think the delete suggestion just needed one objection to cease, so I guess that's the end of that process.  CT55555 (talk) 14:02, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

Disadvantages
Why is there a section for disadvantages (with two citations) that doesn’t say what the disadvantages are? Louie Mantia (talk) 15:18, 28 March 2022 (UTC)


 * I think this section should be deleted. I worked on it before and it has some wild original research about how corridors could be used for nefarious purposes, but it was cited with bad sources and I don't think it deserves to be part of this article. CT55555 (talk) 16:03, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
 * I think that’s a good solution. I’m not sure it’s worth keeping, especially in its current state. Louie Mantia (talk) 16:05, 28 March 2022 (UTC)