Talk:Hungarian Australians

Hungarian Australian
I wish to contribute the following paragraph to " Hungarian Australian " subject as a comprehensive replacement to the existing notion that there are about 55,000 Hungarian Australians in Australia. Please kindly help, thank you.Attilaurm (talk) 02:55, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

Responses to the last 2006 ABS conducted national census questionnaires could reflect the true numbers of Hungarian Australians only if one takes into account not just of the ones born in Hungary. In addition to that, the ethnic Hungarian origin people born outside Hungary who officially and specifically identified themselves of Hungarian ancestry would make up the total of 62,507 Hungarian Australian persons, residents of Australia as per following ABS tabulation under “Hungarian Ancestry”:

- Both parents born overseas:   47,882 - Father only born overseas:     6,075 - Mother only born overseas:     2,370 - Both parents born in Australia: 4,994 - Country of Birth not stated:   1,186 Total:   62,507 Attilaurm (talk) 02:55, 26 August 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Attilaurm (talk • contribs)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hungarian Australians. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090210091720/http://www.hungariancentre.org.au/en/default.asp to http://hungariancentre.org.au/en/default.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 20:29, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

'History' section is unsourced
Aside from a reference for the first Hungarian to arrive in Australia in 1833 - a brief paragraph right at the bottom of the section - there is no sourcing at all for the extended, seemingly authoritative content making up a very comprehensive section. Wikipedia is strictly WP:NOR. If there are no reliable sources for this content, it will need to me pared back dramatically. I've tagged the article for original research, as well as a need for sources to back up the existing content. All of the content may be true, but without quality scholarly sources to back up contentions it's simply an opinion piece. Thanks to interested editors for your attention --Iryna Harpy (talk) 06:13, 2 April 2018 (UTC)