Talk:Hurricane Audrey

Todo
Solid article. All that's really needed is a better intro. Jdorje 21:52, 11 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Hmm, well, with all the high-quality articles we're getting now, this one is pretty lacking by comparison. But it might be too old to find good info. &mdash; jdorje (talk) 20:01, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
 * I added more info and upped this to B-Class. Storm05 17:12, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Ehh, could you give it a good copyedit first? I dropped it to start temporarily, but it shouldn't take much to bring it back up. Hurricanehink ( talk ) 23:13, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
 * You know what, close enough. Just be sure to copyedit it. Hurricanehink ( talk ) 17:42, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

GA on hold
This article will be put on hold (for 7 days) until these minor adjustments can be made :


 * 1. Well written? Pass
 * 2. Factually accurate? Pass
 * 3. Broad in coverage? Pass
 * 4. Neutral point of view? Pass
 * 5. Article stability? Pass
 * 6. Images? Pass

Additional comments : Lincher 20:52, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Is it possible to have a damage figure according to 1957, if possible. It would be more accurate for that time and would be better for the article.
 * 'Hurricane Audrey left $1 billion dollars '' to deposit where? sorry for being sarcastic. ;)
 * Minor changes made. Inflation calculator was used to get the 1957 figure. CrazyC83 21:02, 15 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Thanks for such an addition, it gives a more accurate example of that day's amounts. Lincher 01:17, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

Tornado outbreak
Here's a website describing the tornadoes from Audrey in Alabama (in a list of June tornadoes). It has some good stats that should be added. Hurricanehink ( talk ) 23:37, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
 * http://www.srh.noaa.gov/bmx/tornadoes/jun.php

GA Sweeps Review: Pass
As part of the WikiProject Good Articles, we're doing sweeps to go over all of the current GAs and see if they still meet the GA criteria. I'm specifically going over all of the "Meteorology and atmospheric sciences" articles. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. I have made several minor corrections throughout the article. Altogether the article is well-written and is still in great shape after its passing in 2006. Continue to improve the article making sure all new information is properly sourced and neutral. It would be beneficial to go through the article and update all of the access dates of the inline citations and fix any dead links. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. I have updated the article history to reflect this review. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 07:33, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

Reference upgrade
A few of the references were dead, and others were not from primary sources. The references have now been "upgraded" and filled out with information which would be needed in a GAN passage nowadays. Thegreatdr (talk) 22:27, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

Clarify tag added
In a paragraph about earliest category 4/5 occurrence in the basin, there is a line that states that 2nd place goes to Dennis, but that the record was "rebroken" nine days later. That can't be right. Did the author mean that both Dennis and Emily were other category 4/5 systems which formed before August 1? I'm not sure the Emily line even needs to be there. Thoughts? Thegreatdr (talk) 03:18, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Maybe remove the record section? Audrey only has the record for earliest C4 hurricane and the earliest US major hurricane landfall, both bordering trivial IMO. --♫ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 03:25, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

Damages
This article lists as the total damage amount for Audrey, however based on the 1996 edition of The Deadliest, Costliest, and Most Intense United States Tropical Cyclones list i have a damage amount of. Can we find the discrepency and deal with it please? Also note that if i am reading the Canada section correctly we have to increase the death toll by 15. Thanks.Jason Rees (talk) 01:43, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hurricane Audrey. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130217210552/http://www.aoml.noaa.gov/general/lib/lib1/nhclib/mwreviews/1957.pdf to http://www.aoml.noaa.gov/general/lib/lib1/nhclib/mwreviews/1957.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 07:41, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

GA Delisting
After some off-wiki discussion with other WP:WPTC members, I am delisting this article from GA status. It was originally promoted in 2006 when GA standards were considerably lower. A cursory review of this article shows glaring gaps in coverage, with no impact in the hardest-hit state (Louisiana) even present in the body of the article. The amount of effort necessary to bring this up to snuff is beyond the scope of a GAR, thus we've agreed to demote the article so other users are aware of the lacking quality. ~ Cyclonebiskit (chat) 17:39, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hurricane Audrey. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060426212327/http://www.booksbynolaross.com/hurricane.htm to http://www.booksbynolaross.com/hurricane.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 01:15, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

Is this ready for GAN?
- is this article ready for GAN? It's technically part of the 1957 AHS good topic, so this article is all that's missing for it to remain a good topic. If you don't have the time or interest to take care of the GA review, please let me know. ♫ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 16:02, 8 March 2019 (UTC)