Talk:Hurricane Julia (2010)

To do

Since Julia was quite an eventful tropical cyclone (history-wise), there's enough information available to write a substantial article. However, there are several things that could currently use considerable improvements, particularly the meteorological history. Some things to work on:

• Lede - requires a better prose and possibly more useful information.
• Seasonal records - all records set by the cyclone require factual references.
• Wikify - provide linking to more important terms which could confuse a casual reader.
• Sourcing - needs more adequate references and information. The met history is currently poorly written, not very informative, and lacks certain aspects; it requires more accuracy and elaboration, supported by reliable and detailed sources such as cyclone discussions by the NHC. Avoid citing public advisories altogether; discussions generally cover the same aspects in a broader sense.
• Copy-edit - the article is not necessarily insubstantial, but it lacks flow; the prose and grammar could be much better.

In all, this article is at a good start, but it currently lacks certain aspects that could make it great. Some sections require clarification, with concise and detailed information provided by factual sources. That's all I can think of for now – feel free to add to the list. Hylian Auree (talk) 18:12, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

Julia Image

Is it possible to change the image of Hurricane Julia, because the current one is good, but it shows Julia as a minimal hurricane. Don't you think that the article would be better with a photo of hurricane Julia at her peak? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ryder Busby (talk • contribs) 04:15, 9 December 2010 (UTC)

Without 2010?

Julia doesn't need the 2010 when it's the only one of the name. While they move this people should also move the other names only used once.39.tg (talk) February 19 2011

Some have argued that, but I have fought to keep it on all of them. There is no chance Julia will be retired. CrazyC83 (talk) 16:52, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

But it doesn't matter whether Julia is retired or not. It's still the only hurricane of its name, so there is no need for the (2010). ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 17:31, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Tropical Storm Sebastien (1995) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RM bot 04:16, 3 September 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Hurricane Julia (2010). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.expressodasilhas.sapo.cv/pt/noticias/go/mau-tempo--estragos-no-interior-de-santiago-e-no-fogo
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.ionline.pt/conteudo/78244-tempestade-julia-afasta-se-gradualmente-cabo-verde

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 08:00, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

Requested move 21 October 2016

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved -- Tavix ^(talk) 22:10, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

---

Hurricane Julia (2010) → Hurricane Julia – It was the only storm with the name to become a hurricane N-C16 (talk) 09:17, 21 October 2016 (UTC) --Relisting. Anarchyte (work | talk) 12:12, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

• Support per nomination. —Roman Spinner (talk)(contribs) 06:46, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Move to Hurricane Julia (2010)

Now that 2022’s Julia reached hurricane status, should this be moved to: Hurricane Julia (2010)? VehicleandWeatherEnthusiast2022 (talk) 14:43, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

Maybe yes because 2022 now has more impact (already 27 deaths) Thingofme (talk) 15:13, 10 October 2022 (UTC)