Talk:Hyderabad District, Sindh

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Pakistan: Sindh Mid‑importance

	Pakistan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Sindh (assessed as Mid-importance).

Pakistani districts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistani districts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistani districts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pakistani districtsWikipedia:WikiProject Pakistani districtsTemplate:WikiProject Pakistani districtsPakistani districts articles

Geography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Geography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of geography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GeographyWikipedia:WikiProject GeographyTemplate:WikiProject Geographygeography articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Geography To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : See Requested articles/Social sciences/Geography, cities, regions and named places and Missing articles about Locations
Assess : Tag related article talk pages with {{WikiProject Geography}}. To help assess the quality and importance of geography articles, please see: Unassessed geography articles and Unknown-importance geography articles.
Cleanup : See Geography articles needing attention
Deletion sorting : Listed at Geographic related deletion discussions
Geographical coordinates : See Articles missing geocoordinate data by country
Infobox : See Geography articles needing infoboxes
Map : See Wikipedia requested maps
Notability : See Geography articles with topics of unclear notability
Photo : See Wikipedia requested photographs of places
Stubs : See Geography stubs

It stated that "The Kirthar National Park is located in Hyderabad district."

Kirthar National Park was never within the District limits of Hyderabad District.  It was within Hyderabad Division and in District Dadu.  Since then District Dadu also has been bifurcated into Distrcits Dadu and District Jam Shoro.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.71.75.3 (talk) 12:46, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"Urbanised" = "Advanced"?[edit]

At present, the article states:

According to the 1998 census of Pakistan. it had a population of 4,339,445 of which 50.07% were urban[1]. It is thus the second-most advanced district in Sindh.

Read as stated, this seems to indicate that the district is "advanced" because it has a high percent urban population. (Of course, formally it also could mean that it is advanced because it has a low urbanisation percent; but I find that rather unlikely to be intended.) Now, not everybody agrees that a higher percentage of city-dwellers in a district automatically indicates that it is more "advanced".

Hence, I propose that "second-most advanced" is replaced by "second-most urbanised", if indeed this is what is intended. If there are some other criteria used, then add these, and remove "thus".--JoergenB (talk) 20:39, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good point

I have amended as suggested.

Pahari Sahib 21:00, 27 December 2007 (GMT)

Hyderabad Division page redirected here[edit]

Rather than there being a one-liner Hyderabad Division page, I have redirected the page to fall onto this page. Please comment if you disagree. - Arun Reginald (talk) 13:30, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Requested Move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved per request. - GTBacchus^(talk) 02:18, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hyderabad district, Pakistan → Hyderabad District, Pakistan — Consistency with all other articles on Pakistani districts. Pahari Sahib 23:03, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hyderabad District, Sindh. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090720044627/http://www.statpak.gov.pk:80/depts/pco/statistics/pop_education/pop_education_rural_urban.html to http://www.statpak.gov.pk/depts/pco/statistics/pop_education/pop_education_rural_urban.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:31, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]