Talk:Hyperlipidemia

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 21 October 2019 and 15 November 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Luoy15, Annajacobs1. Peer reviewers: Stevent99.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 00:09, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Not
Not long ago, the hyperlipidemia page was longer, with interesting references. Any idea what happened to it? And can it can be restored? SylvieB 17:22, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

Ditto Sylvia's comment -- where are the references??

They were apparently deleted accidentally by SyvlieB's edit of 16:55, 3 May 2007. Oops! Looks like they were restored by Xezbeth (not me).

Disease of what species?
I found a link to this page from the article on donkeys. Somebody who is competent please insert data on what species can suffer from this? Humans? All mammals?? Only some mammals? Other species? Pete unseth (talk) 17:10, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

Children
10.1210/jc.2013-3860 - review in JCEM. JFW &#124; T@lk  22:18, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Hyperlipidemia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120327213629/http://www.cags.org.ae/FMPro?-DB=ctga.fp5&-Format=ctga%2Fctga_detail.html&-RecID=34563&-Find to http://www.cags.org.ae/FMPro?-DB=ctga.fp5&-Format=ctga%2Fctga_detail.html&-RecID=34563&-Find
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110927092340/http://www.pharmacist.com/AM/Template.cfm?Section=Home2&CONTENTID=14388&TEMPLATE=%2FCM%2FContentDisplay.cfm to http://www.pharmacist.com/AM/Template.cfm?Section=Home2&CONTENTID=14388&TEMPLATE=%2FCM%2FContentDisplay.cfm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 14:22, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

Wiki Medicine Project
Hello everyone! We are two 4th year medical students at UCF College of Medicine. We are planning to update and expand this article during the next few weeks. Our focuses will be expanding screening & diagnosis (Yi), and management (Annie), specifically: potentially adding citations to intro and expanding on cardiovascular complications, addition of screening tests, current guidelines, diagnostic criteria - addition of management, lifestyle changes, medical treatments (e.g. contraindication, adverse effects). Thank you for your feedback and we look forward to beginning! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Annajacobs1 (talk • contribs) 13:27, 24 October 2019 (UTC)

Peer Review I am reviewing the work of Annajacobs1 and Luoy15

Here is the link to the article I reviewed: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hyperlipidemia&oldid=925160819

The lead reads well. It gives a concise overview of the topic. Keywords contain links out to proper pages to familiarize the reader. Three sources are used. Spot-checked links function properly. Things in the lead that could possibly be improved are more sources (for uncited info) and page number in the Lilly source.

Overall, appears to have at least enough content that would be in a typical encyclopedia. The content that was added by the users was relevant to the topic including major additions and overhauls to the screening and management section. The sections included in the article appear complete. Article may benefit from section on epidemiology and prognosis but it is evident that great work was put into this article over the past four weeks. Epidemiology does appears to be mixed in within the Classification section. Clinical manifestations appear to be mixed into Classification. Tone of the article appears to be within Wikipedia guidelines. This is very nit-picky but "patients" is mentioned once. Per Wikipedia guidelines consider changing to "people".

Links were added by the users. Good amount of links in Management section. Screening section may benefit from addition of links. Images within article are relevant with sufficient captions. Could consider adding a picture of a clinical manifestation such as a xanthoma. Spot-checked references throughout article function properly. Sources appear reliable with broad overviews of the topic including textbooks and review articles. The addition of section headings by the users improved organization.

I do believe this article has improved greatly. Great advancements were made especially within the Screening and Management sections. All sections within the article appear complete. Consider suggestions as outlined above, otherwise good work!!

Stevent99 (talk) 23:49, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

WikiMed Fall 2019 Peer Review
Thank you for your feedback, Steven. It was really helpful. I have made the changes you suggested. Luoy15 (talk) 18:44, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

Endocrine disorders: guideline
10.1210/clinem/dgaa674 JFW &#124; T@lk  17:03, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

Review (Bebrich & Hegele)
10.1210/endrev/bnab037 JFW &#124; T@lk  12:07, 15 July 2022 (UTC)