Talk:Hyphomicrobiales

brucella
is also an important member of the group --ArazZeynili (talk) 07:23, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Rhizobiales. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130127030659/http://www.bacterio.cict.fr/classifphyla.html to http://www.bacterio.cict.fr/classifphyla.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 10:23, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

Outgroup position
Two taxa as outgroup(s), and with a common ancestor on same level as Meganema and the rest of Rhizobiales looks very strange (this outgroup isn't really an outgroup per current design of the cladogram). Moreover, AFAIK Sphingomonas belongs in fact to Caulobacteridae, but Magnetospirillum doesn't. Because of the basal position of Magnetospirillum inside Alphaproteobacteriae, the last common acestor of Magnetospirillum and Sphingomonas is also an ancestor of all Caulobacteridae (including Rhizobiales) and of all Alphaproteobacteria. So how can it be corrected? --Ernsts (talk) 15:44, 29 April 2019 (UTC)