Talk:INDECT

The criticism sections seems very biased. It basically follows what the P&R department of project INDECT has been feeding the media. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.64.106.232 (talk) 07:50, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

This is true. I've added the Controversy section from the 4th of October, which a vandal had removed. Also, at least two claim in the section is not supported by the source it cites. I therefore added the "not in citation given" tag. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Deathmare (talk • contribs) 15:12, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on INDECT. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071020025208/http://www./ to http://www./
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070802165906/http://www.put.poznan.pl/en to http://www2.put.poznan.pl/en

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 06:42, 10 November 2017 (UTC)