Talk:Immigration to Pakistan/GA2

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Jhbuk (talk) 14:52, 2 April 2010 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * A few typos I'm correcting. Lead might need some rewriting?
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * No references in "Demographics", but otherwise very good
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * The article essentially describes current immigration patterns, but gives little information about background: Why are there only two short sentences about immigration before 2001? The article completely neglects historical immigration; No information about public opinion; Not much information about the effects the immigration has had
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * Reasonable
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Only one image; if you can get any more it would help. No alt text, but that is not required for GA
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Fail for now: Not convinced about completeness
 * Fail for now: Not convinced about completeness