Talk:Impact Is Imminent

Fair use rationale for Image:ExodusImpactIsImminent.jpg
Image:ExodusImpactIsImminent.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:32, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Requested move

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was moved to Impact Is Imminent. Aervanath (talk) 02:58, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

Impact is Imminent → Impact Is Imminent &mdash; as per comments by Cannibaloki copied below. kotra (talk) 19:27, 15 July 2009 (UTC) ''Originally listed as uncontroversial move at WP:RM, but contested, so listed as normal Requested Move. Discussion copied from WP:RM at 19:27, 15 July 2009 (UTC):''
 * Impact is Imminent →  — Naming conventions —
 * Not uncontroversial. Capitalizing "is" is something that isn't unilaterarly agreed on. There have been move discussions (see here) where the capitalization of "is" was shot down as unnecessary or even incorrect. I suggest you start a discussion on this. Jafeluv (talk) 10:57, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Naming conventions: "Note that short verbs (Is, Are, and Do) [...] are capitalized." The section "Album and song titles and band names" in naming conventions is about music, not television episodes.--  C  anniba loki  16:37, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Support per Naming conventions (capitalization). Jafeluv (talk) 06:51, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.