Talk:Improved Outer Tactical Vest

= SPC Joseph Henry, So What? = Wikipedia is not a soapbox for SPC Henry's thoughts on the IOTV. This article should definitely be policed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.146.160.51 (talk) 20:42, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

The above was from me, was not logged in at the time. And to further clarify, my comment and removal of SPC Henry's personal thoughts in the body of the article does not necesarily mean I disagree. It's only that Wikipedia is not meant for some random E-4 to make a statement. Jersey John (talk) 20:45, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

= Past dated future talk =

'The US Army is looking into supplementing the heavy IOTV with a new lightweight Modular Body Armor Vest (MBAV), which already in service in Ranger and Airborne units. The MBAV does provide less protection, but is more suitable for patrol in Afghanistan than the IOTV. The first units should begin receiving body armor on May 11, 2009.[5]'  ====   The date speaks of the past as if it is future "should begin -- 2009"  Should this not be updated with the current usage statistics and otherwise? I'm not equipped to modify the current as I've no knowledge on the subject, but this nonetheless seems odd for an article to do 24.42.194.134 (talk) 01:33, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Improved Outer Tactical Vest. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.baesystems.com/BAEProd/groups/public/documents/bae_publication/bae_pdf_mps_indv_hard_armor.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 10:04, 25 May 2016 (UTC)