Talk:Indecent exposure in the United States

Merger
Someone suggested a merger, but there's been no discussion. I agree that Indecent exposure and Public indecency should be merged. Fences and windows (talk) 15:26, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes they are very similar I suggest they should be merged.Etineskid (talk) 14:55, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
 * I've just merged the US sections. Someone keep going.-- W☯W  t/c 08:18, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes. This article is fairly dismal.  The pic is very nice though-- suggests that looking,  may be more indecent than the act itself!  KenThomas (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 00:11, 27 December 2010 (UTC).

Um, Weasel words? Really?
I can't accept that the statement that, in effect, that the 50 U.S. state jurisdictions are uneven in their definitions of public indecency requires enumeration, even partial enumeration, of the states. Since this is the totality of the "weasel words" flagged in this section, I'm removing both the inline flags and the section tag. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.246.173.144 (talk) 13:16, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Indecent exposure in the United States. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080908114147/http://www.lalecheleague.org/law/lawbills.html to http://www.lalecheleague.org/Law/LawBills.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 10:19, 22 January 2016 (UTC)