Talk:Indian Institute of Advanced Study

WikiProject class rating
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 08:32, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

Template:Infobox Indian Institute of Technology
This article uses the template Infobox Indian Institute of Technology. This template was forked from Infobox university way back in 2006. The template Infobox university has been completely rewritten since then, and this forked template has not benefitted from these improvements. From the point of view of maintenance, a few standard templates are better than a collection of many specific ones.

As this is a Research Institute, the appropriate template would appear to be Infobox laboratory. If the template Infobox Indian Institute of Technology in this article were replaced with Infobox laboratory, no information would be lost. I therefore suggest that this be done. HairyWombat 21:58, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

Later. Done. HairyWombat 17:07, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Indian Institute of Advanced Study. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071007100559/http://www.iias.org/old_academics_fellows_of_the_institute1.html to http://www.iias.org/old_academics_fellows_of_the_institute1.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 02:47, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

Fellows of the Institute
This is a lengthy and detailed section. Is it usual to have a list of all the fellows? Is it usual to give details against names if there is to be such a list? It probably is not appropriate to have a Notable alumni section instead. I would think it more appropriate to refer the reader to its reference publication (where the layout of the information is also superior).--Brenont (talk) 20:51, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
 * I have removed this section. A comprehensive list of alumni isn't appropriate, particularly when unreferenced and no information about notability is given. -- Mikeblas (talk) 21:01, 4 February 2018 (UTC)