Talk:Inside Washington

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Martin Agronsky#Agronsky & Company, Martin Agronsky's Evening Edition, Agronsky At Large|Agronsky & Co.]] The anchor (#Agronsky & Company, Martin Agronsky's Evening Edition, Agronsky At Large) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Is Inside Washington also known as Eye on Washington since my channel guide has that name and the show is exactly the same as this article says.--Gdo01 03:09, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No. Eye on Washington is the show Gannett replaced Inside Washington with when Gordon Peterson left Gannett's WUSA for WJLA. As most PBS stations had agreements with Gannett the former distributor, Inside Washington was replaced by Eye on Washington on many of those stations. Eye on Washington is hosted by current WUSA anchor Derek McGinty, formerly of ABC News World News Now and NPR's The Derek McGinty Show. — SterlingNorth 21:41, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Although, there is a possibility that what happened is your PBS member station opted not to renew the contract with Gannett for its show and recently replaced it with Gordon Peterson's original show... — SterlingNorth 21:43, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Theme music[edit]

I'm just curious - what is the theme music tor Inside Washington? 71.168.84.142 (talk) 17:00, 31 January 2010 (UTC)Jen.[reply]

no disputed neutrality[edit]

Peterson never expressed his own opinion except obliquely, but the show was somewhat one-sided, Krauthammer being the lone conservative voice, if Thomas and Totenberg frequently hedged. There is no reason, however, to bring McLaughlin's program into this except to say that the participants are certainly more vociferous and pugnacious, and coming largely from the Right instead of the Left, Eleanor Clift fills Krauthammer's role. Both shows, tho, would probably dispute my characterization of their bias, and suppose themselves to balanced. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.231.37.186 (talk) 03:23, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]