Talk:Intermediate distribution frame

including, but not limited to
"Including, but not limited to" is lawyer-speak and is unnecessary since "including" implies additional items already. --Unimath (talk) 16:01, 31 August 2009 (UTC)


 * I get the impression the source document 1037C is, at least in part, a glossary for lawyers haggling over the meaning of US government contracts. So, yes, much of it should be trimmed down to leaner, sprightlier prose for our purposes.  Jim.henderson (talk) 03:26, 2 September 2009 (UTC)