Talk:International Chiropractors Association

Parochial
Where the article indicates that the majority of DC's find the "attitude parochial", the reference is to the majority (membership) association, which specifically includes the wording "therapeutic", for which the ICA is specifically "non-therapeutic". This includes all forms of physiotherapy, which is the essential difference between "straight" and "mixer".Д-р СДжП,ДС 21:04, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on International Chiropractors Association. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20161230000000/http://data.memberclicks.com/site/ahc/ChiroHistoryPrimer.pdf to http://data.memberclicks.com/site/ahc/ChiroHistoryPrimer.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 23:04, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

dated links
There are several dated links that need to be cleaned up. They also seem to be included with statements that would be better suited for the discussion of controversy on the general chiropractic page. Pacmann117 (talk) 02:56, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

objective language
There are many instances of statements in this article which are clearly promoting an opinion. Additionally, these statements use vocabulary which the average reader would not be familiar with, such as "parochial". I have replaced this with objective language. While attempting to maintain the underlying though which appears to question why there are two major national chiropractic associations. Again, there is a general area for discussing the controversy of chiropractic on the general chiropractic page Pacmann117 (talk) 03:29, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

Anti Vaccine
There is sourced information about the views of the ICA on vaccinations. I recently added the information and a probable COI editor has reverted me. I am asking for additional eyes on the article and specifically about the information I added in.-- VViking Talk Edits 19:13, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

I have requested additional eyes on this article as I feel their anti-vaccine views should be included. If you invite Andrew Wakefield to your conference, even if the conference is only a subset of your organization, but one of your bigger conferences, you are clearly showing your bias towards anti-vaccine tendencies. As anti-vaccine is a fringe subject I feel this is an important aspect of the organization that should be included in their article. -- VViking Talk Edits 01:59, 17 August 2019 (UTC)

Also worth noting that the ICA website hosts the well know, but very cherry-picked antivax reference collection "1200 Studies" by Alan Palmer. I'm not sure that's worth noting on the main page, but it's another piece of evidence that would make it hard to argue that the organization doesn't support the Anti-vaccine movement.Nrjank (talk) 20:01, 30 October 2019 (UTC)