Talk:International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis

Requested move

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: page moved. Vegaswikian (talk) 21:37, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

IIASA → International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis — Rename per WP:NAME. Beagel (talk) 12:36, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Support. Initialisms should rarely be used for article titles. Station1 (talk) 07:28, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Support. As long as the redirect through IIASA is preserved, of course. — Aldaron • T/C 16:15, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Biased Writing
This page sounds like it was written by an IIASA representative. It sounds as though it is written from the viewpoint of the IIASA rather than from an external viewpoint. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.173.215.82 (talk) 15:06, 17 November 2011 (UTC)


 * I wholeheartedly agree. Some of the writing, especially in the lead, sounds like marketing speak. I don't know how this article went this long without being tagged. &#123;&#123;u&#124; Bowler the Carmine &#125;&#125; (he/him &#124; talk) 14:44, 12 August 2022 (UTC)

Rather Misses the Whole Point.
The IIASA was set up at the joint suggestion of Oskar Morgenstern and Khruschev's nephew, Gvishniani (?) damn, I'm ashamed of not being exactly sure of his name, to serve as a back channel between the Eisenhower Administration and the Kremlin -- at a time when both sides of the cold war knew the dangers of accidental miscommunication, but both were inhibited by their own hard-liners. Coincidentally, Roger Levien, who was later a co-director of the IIASA (with Anatol Rapoport, later of University of Michigan at Ann Arbor, and then, because of his opposition to the Vietnam War, of University of Toronto), Levien, as a RAND Corporation contractor set up the first "red telephone," the almost-direct teletype and later telephone connection between the Oval Office and the Kremlin. Everything in the article about the IIASA doing useful work in systems analysis was pretty much true by the 1980s or 1990s, and they still do good work of that kind today. I particularly like the style of their "Let's increase the standing lumber of Russia by a hundred billion tons in the next hundred years" project. DavidLJ david.lloydjones@gmail.com June 3, 2013.

https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Хенкин,_Кирилл_Викторович writes in his autobiography-cum-biography of his friend Willie Fisher aka https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rudolf_Abel "The Upside-down Hunter" (1980) that IIASA was founded by USSR as an influence operation, same as the Prague-based magazine "Problems of Peace and Socialism" ("World Marxist Review"), and operated in a similar manner. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.249.121.125 (talk) 20:02, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050627082900/http://www.iiasa.ac.at/Admin/DI/docs/IIASA_NMO.html to http://www.iiasa.ac.at/Admin/DI/docs/IIASA_NMO.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 02:59, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131203000256/http://www.iiasa.ac.at/web/home/about/achievments/iiasaandthenobelprize/ipcc/IPCC.en.html to http://www.iiasa.ac.at/web/home/about/achievments/iiasaandthenobelprize/ipcc/IPCC.en.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140115120757/http://www.iiasa.ac.at/web/home/research/Global-Water-Futures-and-Solutions--World-Water-Scen.en.html to http://www.iiasa.ac.at/web/home/research/Global-Water-Futures-and-Solutions--World-Water-Scen.en.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110716175200/http://www.iiasa.ac.at/Admin/DI/docs/director.html?sb=1 to http://www.iiasa.ac.at/Admin/DI/docs/director.html?sb=1
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110123131844/http://ies.jrc.ec.europa.eu/uploads/fileadmin/H00/hordijk_CV-IES.pdf to http://ies.jrc.ec.europa.eu/uploads/fileadmin/H00/hordijk_CV-IES.pdf
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100414042251/http://ies.jrc.ec.europa.eu/index.php to http://ies.jrc.ec.europa.eu/index.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 16:55, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

Controversy section
There has been a bit of an edit war over an unreferenced "Controversy" section over the past few weeks, but in any case WP:BLP takes precedence as this is extremely contentious material about a living person, so it should never have been added (or restored) without reliable sources that justify its inclusion. Policy dictates that such material should be removed immediately and that it's up to the editor who is seeking to restore the material to provide the reliable sources to merit inclusion. I have just removed it for this reason, and if anyone wants to include it in the article, I strongly recommend looking for reliable sources first, and perhaps it would be more appropriate to integrate the content within other sections rather than a stand-alone controversy section. DanCherek (talk) 06:56, 19 August 2022 (UTC)