Talk:International Software Testing Qualifications Board

Hello everybody,

the last two links do not work —Preceding unsigned comment added by Erkan Yilmaz (talk • contribs) 23:50, 29 September 2006 (UTC)


 * They may as well be removed. I'll do it. JonHarder 00:22, 30 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Hi JonHarder, I did not know the exact rules, also it may also have been, that the links will work again later and perhaps there is a chekcing-time for this I thought. CU, --Erkan Yilmaz 01:05, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

first sentence already not ok
it says: "The International Software Testing Qualification Board (ISTQB) replaced the existing Information Systems Examination Board (ISEB) Foundation Exam " I mean: how can an organization replace an exam? more probably the author meant the ISTQB Foundation Level exam replaced... --Erkan Yilmaz 12:43, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
 * also this is at the beginning - but at the beginning there should be info about the ISTQB not already details - therefore copying two sentences from ISTQB Certified Tester and putting them at the beginning. --Erkan Yilmaz 12:51, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
 * deleted parts of first sentence, reason stands here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Digitalfunda#Certification
 * --Erkan Yilmaz 10:48, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

Controversy section
The text of the Controversy section refers to multiple domain experts, but only gives one link - to James Bach's blog, embodying his long-expressed dislike of any kind of formal qualification. His opinions may or may not be typical, but that link is HIGHLY POV. ExpatSalopian (talk) 02:51, 8 September 2011 (UTC)

Certification Controversy
Rather than just a dump of links could we have some text please? (This is mainly aimed at Keith). If I'm not busy at the weekend, or later, I'll add something myself. I'm adding this here as Keith obviously has a more eloquent way of putting this than me, so it seems worthwhile him adding it. Jtowler (talk) 06:09, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

CT?
Does the CT in the different qualifications stands for Certified tester? If so I'd like to update it to say so :)94.159.132.229 (talk) 14:22, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

SebaM6's edits
Hi Walter,

Yes, I would like to apply those changes that I introduced. In fact, this was the first of few changes so maybe the sandbox is also a good idea. But for sure we should remove levels from specialists ASAP.

Best Seba — Preceding unsigned comment added by SebaM6 (talk • contribs) 07:34, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi. I suspect you mean these changes. You cannot remove multiple references, remove content, and add links to subjects that don't exist (and are likely not notable), gut the "specialist" column in the table, and do so all without explanation. By all means, add content and modify content that is outdated, but don't just delete it. Walter Görlitz (talk) 16:30, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi. Sorry for delay first of all. I do indestand there is policy behind the wiki. So would you pls help me and point what exactly I need to do section by section. Those data are really outdated and should not be there anymore. Sebastian Małyska (talk) 14:44, 22 Sep 2021 (UTC)