Talk:Interspel

Tone
This article seems to be written in a way that does not describe the subject, but rather explains it from the subject's own point of view. Hence it is not encyclopaedic.


 * Yes, it is very pro-Interspel. Are there not any criticisms of this approach which we could find?  (I, for example, find the use of accent marks to be a clear disadvantage (too hard to type, nobody will be bothered, too non-English looking)). J IM ptalk·cont 08:53, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

vizion??
What the hell is this vizion thing? As far as I can determine, it is not an alternate spelling of vision. Wschart (talk) 00:01, 25 June 2010 (UTC)