Talk:Iqos

Duplicate Entry
A few days after I submitted this AfC someone else actually created Draft:IQOS. I've investigated a bit and this person did not have a CoI, but also merely posted a google translation from the Russian article. I've gone through the few references and there is no information there that is not already present in my own draft, so I took the liberty to remove the tag. Thank you, Aphis Marta (talk) 09:52, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Requested edit
An editor (or at least an account with a single edit) made a benign change to the text, but changing from "first" to "second commercial attempt" does not correlate with the citation given (nor what I've ever found/seen in my research). It has been a few weeks so I guess it went unnoticed. Can someone please change this back? Thank you! ˜˜˜˜
 * Ok, after checking WP:COIU I figured I did not need to bother you guys with this and reverted the change. --Aphis Marta (talk) 10:09, 28 September 2022 (UTC)

A bit much
I know not to discuss article topics but oh man what an awful company, either way does anybody else think the history section is unnecessarily detailed? Does the development of the nicotine patch or how much was spent on some building in Switzerland really matter to this topic? XeCyranium (talk) 01:47, 1 January 2023 (UTC)


 * Agreed. Reduced the extraneous marketing language in the history section. DrNicotiana (talk) 16:55, 14 March 2023 (UTC)