Talk:Isonomia

Merge Isonomy
I put in a request for an article on isonomia because it seemed that a concept that pre-dated democracy really deserved its own article. Unaware of the article on Isonomy I came upon that article by chance and a request to merge it with democracy.

I couldn't find any discussion on the democracy talk pages so there appeared to be nothing to add. Obviously I think it is worth an article on its own. --Mike 13:30, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

Merge with Isonomia --Mike 13:30, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

=
========= "Leave it" Why not just have a link for two pages. Each can be expanded upon. I don't think another page hinders Wikipedia's server storage space. -- User:JivanMutkt 14:27, 09 December 2006 (FF)

The term I've seen being used is isonomia, so I'm not willing to see isonomia disappear, but I am willing to accept that isonomy may a related interpretation in it own right. I'm willing to be isonomic about this and have both entries! --Mike 17:30, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

Isonomy (horse)
Insonomy should not redirect to this page as there is an article Isonomy (horse). Disambiguation page will be better. Tigerboy1966 (talk) 17:02, 29 November 2011 (UTC)


 * I think a "for" hatnote would be more in line with WP:DAB. I think that the Greek term is the primary usage. It is more general and linked to by more general articles. The mainspace pages linking to Isonomy (horse), on the other hand, all appear to be other horses, while the article is about a single horse. I'll add the hatnote.  RJC  TalkContribs 17:31, 29 November 2011 (UTC)