Talk:Isoquercetin

Isoquercetin vs isoquercitrin
I think that the page should be moved from isoquercetin to isoquercitrin, as "isoquercetin" is a misleading name (compare with quercetin and quercitrin), not even mentioned in the Merck index (14th ed.), Isoquercitrin monograph. —Mykhal (talk) 13:12, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

Requested move 21 August 2018

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: not Moved. No consensus to move is present; according to the Natural Medicine Journal Isoquercetin is also sometimes called isoquercitrin: this indicates Isoquercetin is probably a more common spelling. L293D (☎ • ✎) 21:57, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

Isoquercetin → Isoquercitrin – misleading name, see "Isoquercetin vs isoquercitrin" discussion above Mykhal (talk) 13:25, 21 August 2018 (UTC) --Relisting. Dekimasu よ! 19:49, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
 * According to PubChem the two terms are synonymous and refer to the same substance. According to Natural Medicine Journal Isoquercetin is also sometimes called isoquercitrin, a nearly identical quercetin-3-monoglucoside. Technically the two are different (isoquercetin has a pyranose ring whereas isoquercitrin has a furanose ring), but functionally the two molecules are indistinguishable. Not that I trust naturopathy but I hope they have their chemistry right. The article should be edited to reflect that, I don't have idea which term is more common. No such user (talk) 11:43, 28 August 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.