Talk:It's Pat

Comedy Low‑importance

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Film: American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

LGBT studies

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBT-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBT studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBT studiesLGBT articles

Grossing income?[edit]

Apparently this movie grossed only a meager $61'000. That's so low! Can anyone find a reference for this?Setitup (talk) Sorry, I just saw it in the sidebar. I really should read before I speak :) Setitup (talk) 18:49, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

this seems possible considering how it this movie was only shown in 3 citys. thing is i came here to the talk page to find out what 3 citys thos were. but yes with a smaller audience you get smaller revenue and 3 cities is a very small audience.76.244.155.36 (talk) 03:20, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Gender-neutral pronouns?[edit]

Is it possible to change the his/her references in this article to more gender-neutral pronouns? Sicknessandsleep (talk) 20:18, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

How about "it" and "that"? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.127.225.170 (talk) 23:55, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Gender-neutral pronouns that people understand?[edit]

Not many people understand the ze/zir. It should at least link them to the wiki page that explains them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.51.58.33 (talk) 15:16, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. It looks like somebody is forgetting that Wikipedia is not a soapbox. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.144.124.49 (talk) 01:15, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've replaced "zir" with "they"; neologisms are somewhat discouraged on Wikipedia, and I don't think there's any loss in meaning by using "they" instead of s/he. Microchip08 (talk) 01:30, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed - "ze/zir" isn't appropriate at this point, "they" works. ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 07:12, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]