Talk:JACDEC

Proposed Merge
Neither of these articles is really long enough to stand on its own, and the safety index seems like a fairly clear subcategory of the organization that it's named after. A redirect could be set up at JACDEC Safety Index, and all the content put together on one page. --Cantara 18:15, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

Possible inaccuracy
Where has been debated? At Turkish Airlines office? Even without DC-10 Turkish safety record isn't great. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.149.241.188 (talk) 13:47, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

Probable copyright violation
I have removed the "JACDEC safety index" section as a probable copyright violation. The text is very similar to the current version of this www.jacdec.de page; so similar, that I am sure when the section [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=JACDEC&diff=prev&oldid=627318057 was added here], it was a copy-paste from the 2014 version of the external page.

I think the text in the lead section of the article is a sufficient summary of how the index is calculated. -- John of Reading (talk) 11:43, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

Advertising banner removal
Hi all,

Does anyone still think that this page is advertising? I read through it and it seems to be a good article. Geardona (talk) 01:26, 19 November 2023 (UTC)