Talk:JO1

Produce 101 Japan
You must help me to write more about the group name "JO1" Jannahtul (talk) 06:14, 13 December 2019 (UTC)


 * 「“J” from JO1 derived from the word Japan, which is the origin of the group, and “01” meaning the first year of Reiwa (令和) period where the group was introduced.」 Krissy18 (talk) 00:34, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

Contested deletion
This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... (your reason here) --Taitrung1103 (talk) 07:47, 13 December 2019 (UTC)

Protostar
I may be making changes soon, but I just want to note that "single albums" is a concept that doesn't exist in Japan, and Protostar was marketed as a single only. It is not an extended play and should not be listed as such. lullabying (talk) 08:03, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
 * BTW in such case how do we differentiate between Protostar and the title track Mugendai? So we do use Singles to refer to both tables? --Moon Gin (talk) 17:09, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
 * I'd say to take a look at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums/Archive 58. lullabying (talk) 22:52, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
 * This has been applied for months now, but I reckon this should be put here for future reference. According my discussion with Bkonrad as well as the styling convention discussed on here and similar case in H and Summer Trip, a maxi single release that has different title from any songs in it will be considered as an "EP single" (then only "single" for next mention) and its title will be italicized. The article page of the said single will still be under WikiProject Songs like other Japanese maxi singles. Its title track/promoted track will be categorized under promotional single which has been applied on other Japanese discography articles. Yolo4A4Lo (talk) 12:55, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

History Sections
Hello~ I am trying to understand why the "2022-present" section can't be merged with the "2021-2022" section, if history sections are based on album releases. "Midnight Sun" is not an album, as per JO1 discography, and I think that the narrative under the "2022-present" section could fit perfectly under the previous one.

If the section is intended for a future album that will contain songs from "Midnight Sun", then I think that the section should only then be created. It is unsure if any of the songs in "Midnight Sun" will even be in the third album. —  Eugh jei ♥  Kaorin   10:41, 24 January 2023 (UTC)

On name's order
To @ValenciaThunderbolt, I have reverted your edit because: 1. I couldn't find the consensus you mentioned in the added invisible explanation on either WP:KO manual of style and talk page. If you have the link to it, feel free to share it. 2. Even if that's the consensus for Korean project, this page is under Japan project as stated on this Talk Page. 3. Because there's no specific rule on name's order in Japan project, we should follow the universal guide on Template:Infobox musical artist, which states in the case members joined at the same time, names should be written according to alphabetical order. - Yolo4A4Lo (talk) 08:56, 11 November 2023 (UTC)


 * If that is the case, then why is INI, Be First, E-girls and other not like this? If you were to use examples of pages using this, I would understand, but you haven't. ValenciaThunderbolt (talk) 11:29, 11 November 2023 (UTC)


 * In addition, I think you'll find that a majority of J-pop bands/groups use the by age order, rather than the alphabetical order. I think it would be better if you propose that users agree to the by age order, as it is already used on pages such as Arashi's. ValenciaThunderbolt (talk) 11:38, 11 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Every article should refer to the Manual of Style of its main Wikiproject. Just because the are a lot more articles that haven't peer-reviewed or edited by users who are not familiar and follow Wikipedia's Manual of Style, it doesn't mean we shouldn't follow the MOS. To make it clear, I have asked Japan Wikiproject already on here. As they pointed out, your recent edit isn't actually based on age like you stated. It's based on Japanese alphabetical order, which I assume you copied from JO1's official website. Because alphabetical order is what's the norm in Japan. However, because this is English Wikipedia, MOS:JA stated "In the case of names, alphabetize by family name, not by given name". So, that will be followed here, starting with Kawanishi. - Yolo4A4Lo (talk) 06:55, 12 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Actually, I didn't realise it was in alphabetical order until you pointed it out. I thought I was doing according to age. ValenciaThunderbolt (talk) 13:00, 12 November 2023 (UTC)