Talk:Jack Martins

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jack Martins. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120823020536/http://www.elections.ny.gov/NYSBOE/elections/2010/general/2010SenateAmended01272011.pdf to http://www.elections.ny.gov/NYSBOE/elections/2010/general/2010SenateAmended01272011.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 22:30, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jack Martins. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160404203733/http://www.theislandnow.com/williston_park/news/article_aa69a38a-b665-11e1-99a4-001a4bcf887a.html to http://www.theislandnow.com/williston_park/news/article_aa69a38a-b665-11e1-99a4-001a4bcf887a.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 07:18, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

Tags
This article has been tagged since 2017, but there has been zero discussion on the talk page. The page was tagged for POV problems and for an alleged conflict of interest. I removed the conflict of interest tag because there was no stated basis for it on the talk page. I have not removed the POV tag. I just cleaned up the article a bit, removing some poorly sourced material and some overly laudatory language. However, the article still leans in a decidedly pro-Martins direction and could use some balance and additional information. SunCrow (talk) 12:25, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

"Relevant discussion may be found on the talk page"
There has been the neutrality disputed tag on this article for five years, but I dont see any relevant discussion that may be found on the talk page. Does anyone object to the removal of this banner, since there is no justification here for why it should still be up? GeorgeBailey (talk) 12:43, 25 April 2022 (UTC)


 * The article still leans in a decidedly pro-Martins direction and is in desperate need of BlueboyLINY (talk) 03:56, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
 * I have cleaned-up the article as best I could, and removed the tag. BlueboyLINY (talk) 05:44, 31 May 2022 (UTC)