Talk:Jackson Rancheria

Neutrality
I have an issue with this statement: "Margaret and Earl Dalton's dream was the betterment of the Native American's way of life. Their dream is, at long last, coming true."

I think it reads as non-neutral. The author, especially with the inclusion of the phrase "at long last" appears to be taking a stand in favor of the actions of the Daltons.

So why didn't I just reword / delete it and/or flag it for non-neutrality? Primarily because I don't know how it stacks up against similar articles on Native Americans and I don't want to be arbitrary.

So.. any thoughts? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.141.230.105 (talk) 02:04, 2 March 2009 (UTC)


 * You're correct – this is a very oddly written article. For comparable articles, you might check out some of the California Tribes listed on Federally recognized tribes, California. -Uyvsdi (talk) 06:29, 2 March 2009 (UTC)Uyvsdi


 * I agree. I stumbled in from "Random Article" and thought this read more like a biography of Margaret Dalton than anything useful about Jackson Rancheria. There are also no references to back up any statements. 118.93.249.3 (talk) 09:06, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

The major part of this article appears to have been copied from: http://www.jacksoncasino.com/tribal/history.aspx BoKu (talk) 14:20, 6 March 2011 (UTC)


 * The location of the original is now here: http://www.jacksoncasino.com/tribal/history. I have removed it as a copyright violation leaving the article as a stub. Trugster | Talk | Contributions 17:27, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

Third Party Sources Needed
This article is completely lacking in reliable, independent, third-party sources. The only source is controlled by the Jackson Rancheria Casino. Stesmo (talk) 00:03, 8 August 2014 (UTC)