Talk:Jainism/GA2

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Mrt3366 (talk · contribs) 06:44, 25 April 2013 (UTC) : Going to review the article it might take a while.

Checklist
Mr T (Talk?)  [ (New thread?) ] 06:44, 25 April 2013 (UTC) Updated at 14:43, 4 May 2013 (UTC) --- Hello, Thanks for the review. Additional citations are now there in the article. Rahul Jain (talk) 16:45, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

I removed the claim about Jains being in Pakistan, since I could not find a reliable source for that claim. Apart from that, I think the community section is well-sourced now. The inline citation for cosmology and literature section is there now, thanks to. In the meditation section, I removed the part which said 'for complete knowledge'. The line now says that the scriptures offers extensive guidance for meditation techniques, which, as far as I understand, has a neutral point of view. Rahul Jain (talk) 17:53, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep the article on your watchlist. Cheers 👍 Mr T  (Talk?)  [ (New thread?) ] 12:59, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Further comments
Hello there! I must express caution with the decision to pass this article on 1b, for it currently fails to adhere to the manual of style guidelines for lead sections; it does not summarise the rest of the article. I am more than happy to help in rectifying this ommission, but it should not pass GA review without this correction. Best, Midnightblueowl (talk) 20:55, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Hello. If possible, please do help in expanding the lead section. Thanks. Rahul Jain (talk) 03:18, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Sort the outstanding issues. Mr T  (Talk?)  [ (New thread?) ] 14:43, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately I don't have the time at the moment to personally sort this issue. But the lead must adhere to the summary style. If it fails to do so, then it cannot pass GA review. I'd recommend looking at other GA and FA articles on similar topics to see how it is done. Best, Midnightblueowl (talk) 18:10, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The question why do you believe that it is not summarizing the topic? What is missing? Mr T  (Talk?)  [ (New thread?) ] 06:34, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

More
Mr T (Talk?)  [ (New thread?) ] 15:50, 5 May 2013 (UTC)


 * I have placed the citations where they were needed and removed the analogy of the BMW. Rahul Jain (talk) 17:57, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Let me run a quick check. Mr T  (Talk?)  [ (New thread?) ] 06:54, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Okay almost done..last but not the least, work on the lead see what I wrote in section ' '. Mr T  (Talk?)  [ (New thread?) ] 08:22, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
 * We have expaded the lead. Please see whether it meets the requirements. Rahul Jain (talk) 10:58, 7 May 2013 (UTC)