Talk:James Bond/GA2

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk · contribs) 22:46, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: none found.

Linkrot: two found, one fixed, one tagged. Jezhotwells (talk) 22:53, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for picking up the review on this one. I've replaced the dead link and taken out the tag on that one. (Citation 142) Cheers - SchroCat ( ^  •  @ ) 23:07, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria

 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * Prose is reasonably well written, article complies with key MoS elements.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * Article is adequately referenced, sources are RS, spotchecks show statements supported by cites, no OR
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * Article provides a good overview of the subject
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * NPOV
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * article is stable
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Images have suitable licenses or non-free fair use rationales and captions
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Good to see this article considerably improved since delisting over two years ago. Happy to list! Jezhotwells (talk) 23:25, 11 December 2011 (UTC)