Talk:James Bond: The Authorized Biography of 007

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on James Bond: The Authorized Biography of 007. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added tag to http://commanderbond.net/Public/Stories/3115-1.shtml
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080120233347/http://commanderbond.net/article/4647 to http://commanderbond.net/article/4647
 * Added tag to http://web.mac.com/zencato/iWeb/Young_Bond/News/12CC877B-3CD9-45DB-B95E-5233DC472385.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 21:03, 25 December 2017 (UTC)

Canonical Status Debate
The long paragraph debating the canonicity of this book ought to be moved out of the lead section, to its own section somewhere in the main body. Also, reworded, because it's too much of a run-on sentence bridging several obscure concepts. Maybe say less, but word it better. Also: citations.

As a frequenter of online BondForums, I am well aware of the canonicity debate of this book, and all other postFleming materials, and it is a fun debate. But unfortunately I don't think we can cite an online fanforum to prove the existence of a fan debate. Paradoxical, I know. And I doubt there's any published scholarly text covering this question, but if there is, then we should cite it.

J Edward Malone (talk) 20:25, 5 January 2018 (UTC)