Talk:James Cartwright

WikiProject class rating
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 04:05, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Strangely, General Cartwright's official photo in this article has been altered. It differs from the source official photo currently on the DefenseLink site. The top left and bottom right award ribbons in the Wikipedia copy have been modified.

72.83.122.150 (talk) 20:02, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

BLP issues
http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/obama-passes-over-favorite-for-pentagon-top-job/2011/05/24/AFF13qAH_story.html

I don't think any of that overcomes the BLP requirement so please do not add before it gets a lot more solid. Hcobb (talk) 14:10, 25 May 2011 (UTC)


 * More of the same, nothing really solid.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2011/may/25/inside-the-ring-377211977/?page=2

Hcobb (talk) 03:11, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on James Cartwright. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120721002740/http://www.globalzero.org/en/us-nuclear-policy-commission-report to http://www.globalzero.org/en/us-nuclear-policy-commission-report

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 12:29, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

More on the WHY of the Leak
I came here straight from the Article on "Stuxnet", where Cartwright is mentioned. I wonder if there is any RS telling the story of WHY Cartwright leaked the information. Was it for personal gain? Was it authorized by the Obama Administration? Was it part of a larger "operation". As a Reader, all this stuff is very interesting, I'd just like some more. Is there more to be had?Tym Whittier (talk) 08:41, 26 April 2019 (UTC)