Talk:James Haskell

Untitled
I don't know how wikipedia works, and can't be bothered, but put this in here someone: http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/news/article-5016838-details/Three+suspended+over+school+porn+video+/article.do —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.151.110.141 (talk) 14:55, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

NOTHING I HAVE ADDED IS UNTRUE, THE LINK PROVIDED PROVES IT- PLEASE STOP REMOVING IT, ITS A GOOD FAITH EDIT, IM NEW AND TRYING TO CONTRIBUTE TO WIKI AND WHOEVER KEEPS REMOVING MY EDIT IS ANNOYING ME. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.219.153.207 (talk) 21:03, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

The inclusion of the content in question is under discussion at Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard - everyone's comments and thoughts are welcome. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 00:31, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

I think we've reached the end of "it will be removed one day" ... that day is today. If there is some other material about this person's private life that passes Wikipedia's requirements for inclusion, then we should add that to the personal life section. If there isn't, then what this person did as a schoolboy, and what his schoolboy friend did as a legal minor in the country, neither of which things attracted any sort of arrests, never mind charges, is not appropriate for inclusion here. I therefore propose removing it on that basis. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 02:08, 3 June 2012 (UTC)

You've lost me - "did it lead to arrest?" is irrelevant and has nothing to do with policy. --Cameron Scott (talk) 10:58, 3 June 2012 (UTC)


 * The policy it has to do with is WP:BLP. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 18:03, 3 June 2012 (UTC)


 * I'm aware of BLP - I'm not aware how you statement connects to it? The situation is covered in reliable sources (verification) and is one line (weight), so what's the BLP issue? --Cameron Scott (talk) 08:31, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on James Haskell. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081201110900/http://www.rfu.com/index.cfm/fuseaction/RFUHome.Sevens_Detail/StoryID/15376 to http://www.rfu.com/index.cfm/fuseaction/RFUHome.Sevens_Detail/StoryID/15376

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 04:36, 18 April 2017 (UTC)