Talk:James Loney

Proposed Move

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the proposal was moved. --BDD (talk) 22:41, 17 December 2012 (UTC)

James Loney (baseball) → James Loney – Per WP:TWODABS, this Loney is currently more notable than James Loney (peace activist), based on search engine results (16,300,000 & 716,000 results for the baseball Loney, 4,330,000 & 42,700 for the activist Loney on Yahoo and Google) A hatnote will do the job of the disambiguation page. Trut-h-urts man (talk) 03:00, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Support I agree with that reasoning. Also, 13,812 vs. 1,142 page views in the past 90 days demonstrates that the baseball player is the primary subject. – Muboshgu (talk) 02:39, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Support Yes, the baseball player is the primary subject.  Automatic Strikeout  ( T •  C) 02:26, 12 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Support as per the reasons above; definately the primary subject. Tiggerjay (talk) 04:57, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Support per WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. Go   Phightins  !  21:26, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on James Loney. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131029224925/http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2012/08/red-sox-dodgers-complete-nine-player-blockbuster.html to http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2012/08/red-sox-dodgers-complete-nine-player-blockbuster.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 07:22, 18 April 2017 (UTC)