Talk:January 2011 Iraq attacks

Lump 3 separate incidents?
??? Ryan White Jr. (talk) 03:57, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Oh yeah. With the exception of perhaps the last one, none of these could survive as a standalone article, but as a broader overview, all the events can be included. IMO, having the information on a bunch of events is better than having information on just one. C628 (talk) 05:26, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
 * I find it either pre-planned attacks over a number of days with one or more groups involved or a coincidence that the explosive devices were activated three days in a row. I agree with User:C628 to have the explosive devices and the outcome of what happened afterward as one. Adamdaley (talk) 06:25, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your advice. The consensus is that you can have a notable article consisting of 3 bombings even if each one is not notable by themselves.  It's really sad that people are so savage in Iraq. Ryan White Jr. (talk) 04:22, 26 January 2011 (UTC)