Talk:Jay Park/GA2

GA Reassessment
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.''

Most glaring issue is the tag... the article is wildly unsourced throughout post-2013. It also fails accessibility requirements for visually impaired readers. DanielleTH (Say hi!) 01:21, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Hi . Just a ping to say this is still open. The person who opens individual reassessment usually closes when they feel enough time has passed for the issues to be addressed. Just a FYI, but I don't think accessibility is a GA requirement. I vaguely recall a proposal to make it one, but not sure what happened to that. Anyway the citations are more than enough reasons to delist. AIRcorn (talk) 21:24, 2 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Ah, thank you, I forgot about this reassessment since it didn't get much attention. Obviously my concerns haven't been addressed, so I'm delisting. DanielleTH  (Say hi!) 15:41, 3 May 2020 (UTC)